|






.htm_cmp_global010_vbtn.gif)

| |
I. Administrative announcements (see embanet)
II. How to study for Financial
Reporting?
II. Barriers to learning Managerial
Accounting
III. Why use the case method?
IV. 'Where are we & where are we going (posted later)
V. Case 'Takeaways' (provided in class)
VI. How to prepare for Managerial
Accounting?
VII. Managerial vs. Financial vs.
Tax Accounting
VIII. Using accounting
data for 'special' decisions
I. Administrative announcements (handed out in class or posted on
embanet)
II. Barriers to learning? -- dialog with Bob
1. "There is no unifying theme like in Financial Accounting (A=L+OE). Therefore
its difficult to get the big picture."
Bobs response: This is true and its natural to feel this way. Because
relevant data for one purpose may not be relevant for another, good analysis varies with
the "situation." And because "situations" are infinite, your task is
to learn to how to put structure on these complicated settings. Hopefully, by the end of
the course, you will have increased confidence in your decision-making skills.
2. "I learn better when the subject is lectured on first and then we do a
representative problem."
Bobs response: For most students, substitute "feel better" or
"worry less" for "learn better." As discussed above, in my experience
only a few "learn better" -- if we define learning more broadly than rote recall
of the facts, procedures, etc. [These recall items are the things that
typically slip away all too fast after a course is over!]
3. "We could cover more material if Bob would just tell us how to solve these
cases. We wouldnt have to waste time listening to the wrong answers my fellow
students suggest! (and I really hate it when Bob writes one of these wrong answers on the
board!)"
Bobs response: A important task of a manager is sorting between alternative
suggestions (answers) and providing positive feedback. Imagine you are a participant at a
meeting where a couple of work colleagues are presenting their analysis of a major issue.
Would there be a single right answer? What would you want your role to be?
Your boss? Your colleagues?
4. "I feel frustrated when I leave class and Im not sure what is the
right answer to the case."
Bobs response: This feeling can be caused by several factors including:
It is the nature of the material that multiple approaches could be acceptable (
even in financial reporting, there are often multiple acceptable approaches even within
the "rules"). In managerial accounting, there are no rules and thus a
single "correct" answer is often not apparent.
It is the nature of the case method that you are left with an uncomfortable
feeling about what you need to know (for the exam). This is probably the same feeling you
get on the job when asked to do something new.
We may sometimes get pressed for time at the end of class, and the big picture
summary can get rushed or even eliminated.
III. Why use the case method approach to
learning?
A. Why use Cases?
Emulates the environment faced by managers.
Supports the use of real-world materials (because it is
real-world decisions need to be made).
Provides opportunities to observe and react to the (sometimes faulty) reasoning
of real-world managers.
Helps improve judgment & presentation skills:
> conduct personal research on a somewhat unstructured problem.
> sort out data that are relevant to the decision/task from those that aren't.
> learn from others (especially your team or study group).
> build confidence in making judgments from incomplete information.
> build confidence in articulating support for your judgments.
B. Symptoms of potential negative side
effects of using cases?
Feel frustrated when you approach a new case (and the
readings, homework & text don't seem to help that much!).
Feel like learning is inefficient relative to the more common lecture approach.
C. Is the Case Method always appropriate?
Perhaps not for learning structured, repetitive tasks.
Perhaps not when trying to learn many technical tools and concepts in a short
amount of time, e.g., Statistics.
If frustration overwhelms, then can be counterproductive.
D. What have I done to mitigate potential
negative side effects of the Case Method?
Provide more structure via clarification, hints &
examples before many cases.
Attempt to warn you when some cases will need extra time.
Encourage you to draw examples from your own experience.
Encourage you to ask questions in class and via embanet.
Try to summarize key points at the end of each major case.
IV. 'Where are we & where are we going (posted as we proceed)
V. Case TakeAways (handed out in class)
VI. How to prepare a case for managerial
accounting (Especially for those
with a liberal arts background)
A. Theme:
Learning by doing works better than learning by reading.
B. Suggested
Steps:
Read the assigned case(s).
Read the assigned textbook readings. Dont skip the
examples, exhibits and review problems that have all those calculations! These provide
self-tests of your progress and solutions are imbedded. Use some device (e.g., "post
it" notes) so you can locate questions you have about the reading, examples, etc.
Work suggested textbook problems but do NOT look at the
solutions until you have made a legitimate attempt to complete the problem. If youve
worked the Self-Study problems, you shouldnt have much difficulty with the textbook
problems.
Compare your answers to the solution. Attempt to reconcile
(i.e., understand) the differences and write down any questions that come up.
Prepare your "solution" to the assigned case(s).
Work with your study group after being prepared with your
solutions and your questions. Discuss the cases and ask each other questions.
If you had trouble with the case, rework it on your own and
write down any remaining questions you might have.
In class we will discuss the case. Answer my questions (to
yourself if not out loud) and ask your own (if possible). Questions that remain should be
addressed as soon as possible (after class, in help sessions, with study group
members, on embanet, etc.).
Follow-up by seeking help to clear up confusion and to get
remaining questions answered.
Dont fall behind!
C.
Things to avoid when studying?
Procrastination
Reading everything except all of the numbers, tables, and examples
The "I knew that syndrome"
Getting stuck (make an assumption and move on)
Running out of time before getting to the problem, case or exercise
Dividing the work between members of your study group
The path of least resistance
D. What is a
productive positive attitude? (in my opinion):
Take the path of most resistance
Get involved
Invest in yourself
E. Concerns Ive
heard in the past and some thoughts on how you might respond
"My study group is going faster through the material than I can absorb it."
> Have you adequately prepared?
> Have you forced yourself to ask what may seem like embarrassingly simple
questions? (They often arent so simple of course. And those that can ask questions
tend solve their problems most quickly.)
> Can your study groups approach be modified so that getting an
"answer" is less of the focus and understanding the process is more of the
focus? For example, instead of having the strongest person in accounting lead the
discussion, consider a process where the "weaker" persons in accounting present
their approach/solutions to the group.
"I feel like I would be wasting my study groups time if they had to adopt
my pace."
Consider identifying a study partner that you can call on to help you in the early
stage preparation of the cases. (Of course, it would be great if the person is from your
study group but it is not necessary). It may not be necessary to meet in person;
rather, try using the phone or embanet to get through those frustrating places. There are
at least three models for selecting a study partner:
>Your partner is stronger than you in Accounting, e.g.,
They help you get started or restarted if you get stuck
They provide hints but dont do the work for you
>Your partner is about at your level, e.g.,
You help each other get started or restarted if either of you get stuck
You get together before or after study group meetings to go over difficult areas, and
You mutually agree to bring up points you dont understand for discussion at study
group
>Your partner is weaker than you in Accounting,
e.g.,
You assume the role of teacher and learn by helping your partner
You mutually agree to bring up points you dont understand for discussion at study
group or in class
VII. Financial vs. Managerial vs. Tax
accounting
|
Dimension |
Financial Reporting |
Management Accounting |
Tax Accounting |
1. |
Users? |
External and internal; often large percentage unknown to management |
Internal; relatively small group known to management |
IRS!; sometimes substitutes for GAAP financial reports for small businesses |
2. |
Required? |
Generally yes |
NO |
YES (if for-profit) |
|
|
|
|
|
3. |
Purposes? |
Stewardship; |
Planning; budgeting; |
Raise $ for gov't; |
|
|
Basis for contracts; |
Control (operations, etc.); |
Influence social policy |
|
|
Data for decision making |
Decision making |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
Underlying "model"? |
A = L + OE |
Situation specific (nothing general); |
A = L + OE |
|
|
Historical cost (with a few exceptions) |
Future oriented |
Historical cost |
|
|
|
|
|
5. |
Type(s) of data presented? |
monetary; event oriented |
monetary and nonmonetary; decision oriented |
monetary; event oriented |
|
|
|
|
|
6. |
Precision of data? |
fewer approximations; rule oriented (GAAP) |
many approximations |
fewer approximations; rule oriented (tax law) |
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
Report frequency? |
quarterly and annual |
Varies with purpose; real-time, daily, weekly & monthly common |
annual is what counts |
|
|
|
|
|
8. |
Report timeliness? |
annual report often not required for 90 days after year end |
Speed can be essential |
Due dates depend on tax year |
|
|
|
|
|
9. |
Report entity? |
overall organization |
responsibility centers (e.g., business unit, department, product, region,
etc.) |
taxable entity |
|
|
|
|
|
10. |
Potential liability for Company and its Management? |
ask Gabe (ex Iomega CEO) |
virtually none |
lots |
VIII. Using Accounting Data for
"Special" Decisions
A. Background discussion
Most accounting systems are designed to aid routine (i.e., daily,
weekly, or monthly) operating decisions. Examples of accounting tools that aid routine,
every-day decisions include: variance analyses, budgets, and responsibility and
performance reports. "Special" decisions occur with less regularity and vary in
their nature. If you cannot put the decision you face on a pre-formatted, partially
completed form, it probably falls into the category of special decisions. Examples of
special decisions include:
 | accepting or rejecting (or how to price) an unusual sales order; |
 | adding or dropping products, programs, or services; |
 | selecting among alternative equipment; and |
 | performing a task inside the organization or buying it on the outside
(outsourcing). |
Unique factors influence each of these decisions. Fortunately, a single conceptual
approach will aid in the solution of any special decision faced by a manager.
Simply put, relevant data are those future data that differ between the alternatives. You
must predict how future cash flows will differ if you choose one alternative as opposed to
another. Fortunately, you can often use data from your accounting system to help assess
the costs and benefits of each alternative. Unfortunately, you must understand the nuances
of how your accounting system works to be able to extract quantitative data that are
useful in analyzing a special decision.
In summary, data relevant in decision making are the expected future cash flows that
differ between the alternatives. Since some of these cash flows may be difficult, if not
impossible, to predict, one should always evaluate the qualitative as well quantitative
aspects of the decision.
Notes:
On the job, most of your
decisions may be "special" in that they cannot be programmed.
Relevant data fall
into two broad categories: factors that can be quantified and those that are too imprecise
or subjective (qualitative) to make it worthwhile to measure in dollars and cents. It's
not unusual for qualitative factors to be more important in reaching a decision.
B.
Steps to approaching a "special" decision problem
1. Identify the type
of decision you are facing (e.g., accept or reject a special order; pricing; make or buy;
add a product; drop a product; select among alternative projects, etc.). The data you should use will
vary with the decision context.
2. Specify the decision horizon (e.g.,
"short-run" or "long-run"). Even selecting one, you
should consider the impact on the other.
3. Specify the quantitative decision rule (e.g.,
maximize the CM per unit of constrained resource; maximize NPV of future cash flows; minimize
costs).
4. Identify alternatives (e.g., repair machine, replace,
or outsource the activity).
5. Identify and collect relevant data (not all of which
will be available). Relevant data are expected future cash flows that differ between the
alternatives.
6. Making all assumptions explicit, analyze the relevant
available data and apply the quantitative decision criterion. This can be thought
of as your "tentative decision."
7. List and evaluate qualitative factors. This step
is crucial and often overlooked.
8. Weigh quantitative and qualitative
factors and make the final decision.
9. "Hope" for a good outcome.
[Recall the "information game" and how one can have a bad outcome
even after making a series of good decisions!]
Notes:
Short run decisions are generally those where capacity is
fixed. Of course, short run decisions can have long run implications.
A micro-level rule such as
"select among alternative projects to maximize NPV" should ultimately support a
more macro-level criterion such as "maximize the pre-tax profitability of the
division."
Being careful to
avoid obvious pitfalls, e.g., see Hilton, chapter 14, pp. 588-589.
|